Jiangsu Suning Bank (苏商银行)
Jiangsu Suning Bank uses DeepSeek-VL2 to read credit files, with recognition accuracy above 97%
Jiangsu Suning Bank, a Chinese bank, applies DeepSeek's open-weight DeepSeek-VL2 model to read the documents in credit applications, including nested tables and photographed files. A bank representative told China Securities Journal that recognition accuracy passed 97% and the whole credit review became 20% more efficient.
Key figures
Copied exactly from the sources. Copy any figure with its citation.
超97% (over 97%)
Overall recognition accuracy for credit application materials, per a bank representative1
提升了20% (improved by 20%)
Efficiency of the whole credit review process, per a bank representative1
What it took
Cost, team size and timeline were not disclosed in the sources.
The problem
Banks must read large piles of paperwork before they lend. Credit applications arrive as scans, photos and tables nested inside other tables. The bank says its earlier text-recognition software, known as OCR, struggled with low table recognition rates, handwriting and photographed documents.
What they built
Jiangsu Suning Bank, called 苏商银行 in the source, applies DeepSeek-VL2 to credit materials. DeepSeek-VL2 is a multimodal model, meaning it handles text and images together. It is released by DeepSeek as an open-weight model, so its files can be run and adapted by the bank itself. The model reads nested tables and image files and extracts their content.
How they did it
The article gives few technical details. The bank describes combining the multimodal model with a mixture-of-experts design, an approach where different parts of a model handle different kinds of input. It does not state the team, cost or timeline. The article says banks in general are cautious at the start, picking a few scenarios first and widening use later.
Results
A bank representative says overall recognition accuracy for credit materials rose to over 97%. The same person says efficiency of the whole credit review process improved by 20%. These are the bank's own statements, relayed by the newspaper. No before-and-after data, sample or measurement period was published.
Lessons for your project
Start with document-heavy steps where errors are easy to count. Credit files mix tables, scans and photos, so recognition accuracy gives a clear before-and-after measure.
Name what the old tool could not do. The bank described weak table recognition, handwriting and photographed documents as the gaps of its earlier text-recognition software, which makes the improvement testable.
Ask the bank or vendor how accuracy is measured. Recognition accuracy on documents is not the same as the accuracy of the final credit decision.
Treat early rollout as a pilot. The article notes that banks tend to be careful at first, choosing a few scenarios before widening use.
Caveats
- Both figures are statements by an unnamed bank representative quoted by China Securities Journal. No independent measurement is reported.
- The source gives no sample size, test period, baseline definition or go-live date. The deployed date shown is the article month.
- The source describes 'efficiency' of the credit review without saying whether it means time, cost or volume.
- The article names the bank as 苏商银行. The English name Jiangsu Suning Bank is Lumiary's rendering of it.
- The source does not report cost, team size or timeline.
Sources
- 银行的“DeepSeek时刻”:信贷审核等场景已搭上AI快车
China Securities Journal (中国证券报) · 2025-02-11 · News · cs.com.cn
Summarized in our own words from the sources above. Spotted an error? See corrections.